Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 115 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 165 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 9.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 420 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is smaller. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 15 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 95 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`885 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |