Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 326 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 415 NM | 187 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 176 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 228 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mazda 3 2006 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 17 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 29 000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |