Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 422 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 158 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 202 NM more than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 13 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |