Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2008 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 295 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 173 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 146 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 765 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 14 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`040 kg | 1`965 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |