Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2008 vs Audi A3 2008

 
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2008 - 2014
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 295 HP200 HP
Torque: 366 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds7.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 95 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.57.2
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 495 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway980 km on highway
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 135 mm (5.3 inches)110 mm (4.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Engine production duration: 9 years10 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat CC, Volkswagen Beetle, Audi TT
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.29 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 22 cm longer than the Audi A3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 323 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1104 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`040 kg1`895 kg
Net weight:1`560 kg1`335 kg
Load capacity:480 kg560 kg
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Audi A3. Therefore, Audi A3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 45 0005600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher ground clearance
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv