Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 359 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 492 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 209 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 305 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 380 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 3 2006 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`040 kg | 1`770 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`245 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 480 kg | 525 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |