Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2007 -
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 359 HP150 HP
Torque: 492 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.1 seconds9 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution engine produces 209 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 305 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.28.2
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution could require 900 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 380 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
520 km on highway870 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Engine production duration: 9 years13 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.49 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Mazda 3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0401`770
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 26 6002400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv