Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Mazda 626 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 626 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 76 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 157 - 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 6.8 - 9.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 37 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |