Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Toyota Celica 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Celica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 280 HP | 116 - 242 HP | |
Torque: | 353 NM | 154 - 302 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.30 m | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`635 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 22 800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |