Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1996 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Baleno has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Baleno can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 75 - 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 103 - 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 6.6 - 9.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Baleno. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 11 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |