Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Rover 400 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Rover 400 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 280 HP | 86 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 127 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 5.3 - 10.2 | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 14 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.7 metres more than that of the Rover 400, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`684 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Rover 400 has
| |