Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 1999 vs Volvo S40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo S40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 5.4 - 10.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 51 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`445 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |