Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 - 359 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 492 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 8.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 13 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |