Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 - 359 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 492 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 11.1 - 12.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.28 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |