Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Audi A3 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi A3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Audi A3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 - 359 HP | 90 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 492 NM | 148 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | 6.2 - 13.3 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi A3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 14.2 | 4.2 - 9.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 21 cm longer than the Audi A3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1120 litres | |
|
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has 47 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`040 | ~ 1`916 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Audi A3 has
| |