Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 - 359 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 - 492 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 14.2 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is larger. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 323 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`040 kg | ~ 1`796 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`570 kg | ~ 1`257 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 470 kg | ~ 539 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |