Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Ford Ranger 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 405 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 228 mm (9 inches) | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`190 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`900 kg | 2`314 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`100 kg | 876 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 43 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |