Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Toyota Tacoma 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Tacoma) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 69 HP less power than Toyota Tacoma, but torque is 50 NM more than Toyota Tacoma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 11.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tacoma, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 228 mm (9 inches) | 279 mm (11 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Tacoma, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 13.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Tacoma, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`660 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`034 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`000 kg | 626 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem more than Toyota Tacoma. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Tacoma has
| |