Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Ford Ranger 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 405 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.5 | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 228 mm (9 inches) | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`190 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`314 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`000 kg | 876 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 43 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |