Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2022
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`010 kg | 3`230 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`010 kg | 2`189 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`000 kg | 1`041 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 50 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
| |