Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Toyota Tacoma 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Toyota Tacoma) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 278 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 77 HP less power than Toyota Tacoma, but torque is 40 NM more than Toyota Tacoma. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 16.10 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 228 mm (9 inches) | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Tacoma, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 14.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Tacoma, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`023 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`020 kg | 2`282 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 980 kg | 741 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Toyota Tacoma. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Tacoma has
| |