Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Ford Ranger 2025
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi L 200) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 188 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 411 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 60 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 217 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 3.2 l/100km + 18.7 kWh/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 228 mm (9 inches) | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`570 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`640 kg | 2`507 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 930 kg | 993 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 43 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |