Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi L 200 torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 61 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1608 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 933 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |