Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.0 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |