Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 85 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 36 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 19 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 693 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 49 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |