Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |