Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Toyota Hilux 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 54 HP less power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Toyota Hilux. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 293 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Hilux can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Hilux engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 43 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |