Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Toyota Highlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 356 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 145 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, but torque is 44 NM more than Toyota Highlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 10.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus RX, Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Toyota Tacoma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Highlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 34 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 454 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2387 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 607 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Highlander, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 36 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |