Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 81 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Navara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |