Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Nissan Navara 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |