Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 204 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 61 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |