Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 351 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 201 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 300 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 294 mm (11.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 725 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2727 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 101 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |