Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 50 HP less power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Defender. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 900 mm (35.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Defender engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.97 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 29 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 231 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 231 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1061 litres | 972 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2233 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage space (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 68 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |