Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Hyundai Tucson 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 34 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 4.8 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 81 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 598 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1777 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 463 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |