Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford Ranger 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 63 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 283 mm (11.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`130 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |