Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Ranger version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Ford Ranger 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |