Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs BMW X7 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 190 HP less power than BMW X7, whereas torque is 300 NM less than BMW X7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X7 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 15 cm longer than the BMW X7, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2120 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 735 litres more trunk space than the BMW X7. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X7, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 000 | 83 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
BMW X7 has
| |