Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Audi Q7 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 81 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 24 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 740 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1925 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`830 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 43 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |