Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Ranger version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Ford Ranger 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |