Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford F150 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 542 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 144 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 87 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford F150 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford F150 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Ford F150 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 59 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 2192 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi L 200 has 1131 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 55 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |