Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 31 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi L 200 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi L 200 2018 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 61 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1608 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 933 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |