Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 38 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |