Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Toyota Hilux. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Hilux engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 24 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 8 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |