Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Hilux engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Hilux engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |