Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 12 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |