Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 2010 engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200 2015, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200 2015. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 2010 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 2010 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 2010 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200 2015. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 2015 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi L 200 2010 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200 2015, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |