Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 15 HP more power than Isuzu D-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 69 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.19 m | 5.30 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm shorter than the Isuzu D-Max, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |