Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 375 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Ranger. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.19 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi L 200 is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 200 | 18 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
| |