Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 53 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 139 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 13.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 28 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`525 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |