Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.7 seconds | 19.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 14 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 21 cm longer than the Hyundai Terracan, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`525 kg | 2`315 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`685 kg | 1`995 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 840 kg | 320 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 62 procentiem more than Hyundai Terracan. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |