Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi L 200 could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.23 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 53 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1608 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 933 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |